skip to main content
logo

McMaster Health Forum | Insights - Evaluate Innovations

 

Our evaluations have led to many insights about supporting evidence-informed decision-making. Here are our ‘top ten’ lessons learned:

  1. be clear about the goal;
  2. learn and use a systematic approach to analyzing priority issues;
  3. look for the right types of research evidence;
  4. look in the right places for research evidence;
  5. package the best available evidence in the right format and on the right timeline;
  6. use research evidence as the jumping-off point for citizen deliberations;
  7. use research evidence and citizen values as the jumping-off point for stakeholder deliberations;
  8. use the resulting story – evidence, values and insights – to drive change;
  9. make it the norm to use these types of inputs to drive change; and
  10. evaluate innovations in points 5-9 and make adjustments as needed.

In regards to lesson 1, here’s our preferred definition: evidence-informed decision-making means using the best available (data and) research evidence – systematically and transparently and in the time available – in each of: 1) prioritizing problems and understanding their causes (agenda setting); 2) deciding which option to pursue (policy or program development); 3) ensuring that the chosen option makes an optimal impact at acceptable cost (policy or program implementation); and 4) monitoring implementation and evaluating impact – alongside the institutional constraints, interest-group pressure, citizen values and other sources of ideas that influence the decision-making process. It’s long, but it covers all the bases.

For lessons 2-5, we’ve provided many key points on this summary sheet. For lesson 5, read more about our rapid syntheses, evidence briefs and citizen briefs. For lessons 6 and 7, read more about our citizen panels and stakeholder dialogues. And for lesson 9, read more about institutionalizing evidence-informed decision-making.

More from the Forum

Incoming Scholar Opportunity for Students from Commonwealth Countries

Learn more about this scholarship opportunity and how to apply. Read More

2017 Graduate Student Awards: Forum Director and graduate student recognized for outstanding contributions

The winners of the 2017 Graduate Student Awards have been selected and we're pleased to announce that two members of the Forum team are amongst those ... Read More

Rapid Reviews to Strengthen Health Policy and Systems: A Practical Guide

This hands-on guide explores different approaches and methods for the expedited synthesis of health policy and systems research. Read More

PhD students active at the Forum

We’re pleased to announce that Cristina Mattison has successfully defended her PhD thesis. Read More

Forum collaboration with the Chevidence working group

We’d like to express our gratitude for the long-standing partnership we’ve developed with the Chevidence working group. Read More