skip to main content
logo

McMaster Health Forum | Impact - Evaluate Innovations

 

Our evaluations have informed the work of many health-system leaders seeking to make more consistent use of the best available research evidence in strengthening their systems and in getting the right programs, services and drugs to those who need them, and the work of many researchers seeking to evaluate innovations in supporting evidence-informed decision-making. 

Following are four broad categories of examples of our evaluative work (with links to the peer-reviewed publications based on them).

Developing conceptual frameworks to guide efforts to support evidence-informed decision-making about health systems

  • Identifying five questions that should be asked when communicating research evidence

Milbank Quarterly

  • Outlining a broad array of efforts to support evidence-informed decision-making

Bulletin WHO

Positioning systematic reviews as a key input into evidence-informed decision-making about health systems

  • Emphasizing how systematic reviews can be used to address the many questions policymakers and stakeholders may have about a pressing health-system challenge

PLoS Medicine

Systematic Reviews

  • Creating the world’s most comprehensive source of systematic reviews about how to strengthen health systems

Health Res Policy Syst

  • Profiling the global stock of systematic reviews about health systems governance, financial and delivery arrangements

Health Res Policy Syst

Conducting empirical studies (and systematic reviews of studies) of efforts to support evidence-informed decision-making

  • Describing findings about how implementing our processes can support evidence-informed actions to address priority health-system issues (e.g., childhood cancer, chronic pain, multimorbidity)

Pain Res Manag

Healthcare Policy

J Cancer Policy

  • Documenting the views, experiences and intentions to take evidence-informed actions among those who have participated in our processes

Bulletin WHO

  • Synthesizing the findings of others’ evaluations of efforts to support evidence-informed action

Cochrane Database SRs

Building capacity to support evidence-informed decision-making among thousands of health-system leaders and researchers, and sharing our approach

  • Describing the approaches that can be used to support evidence-informed decision-making

Health Res Policy Syst


More from the Forum

Expanding the reach of our Queen Elizabeth Scholars into strengthening health and social systems

The McMaster Health Forum is proud to have been selected as one of 20 Canadian institutions to host the next round of scholars in the Canadian Queen E... Read More

Forum welcomes international Queen Elizabeth Scholars

The McMaster Health Forum is pleased to welcome a new cohort of international Queen Elizabeth Scholars in Strengthening Health Systems to Canada. Read More

Forum programs well positioned to support new five-year strategic plan set by World Health Assembly

As the WHO Collaborating Centre for Evidence-Informed Policy, we're excited to support WHO member states' efforts to reach the 'triple billion' target... Read More

Forum's Queen Elizabeth Scholars in Strengthening Health Systems: Summer 2018

The McMaster Health Forum is pleased to announce the latest set of recipients for the Queen Elizabeth Scholarships in Strengthening Health Systems. Read More

Creating a rapid-learning health system in Ontario

The rapid synthesis provides an Ontario- (or Canada-) appropriate definition of, and set of characteristics for, a rapid-learning health system. Read More