McMaster Health Forum | Impact - Evaluate Innovations
Our evaluations have informed the work of many health-system leaders seeking to make more consistent use of the best available research evidence in strengthening their systems and in getting the right programs, services and drugs to those who need them, and the work of many researchers seeking to evaluate innovations in supporting evidence-informed decision-making.
Following are four broad categories of examples of our evaluative work (with links to the peer-reviewed publications based on them).
Developing conceptual frameworks to guide efforts to support evidence-informed decision-making about health systems |
|
|
|
|
|
Positioning systematic reviews as a key input into evidence-informed decision-making about health systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conducting empirical studies (and systematic reviews of studies) of efforts to support evidence-informed decision-making |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Building capacity to support evidence-informed decision-making among thousands of health-system leaders and researchers, and sharing our approach |
|
|